|
Interhouse Committee
|
Home
Caltech
ASCIT
Minutes
March 11, 2003
IHC Minutes, 03-11-03
Lunch: IHC and Kim West The IHC (everyone present)
Met with Kim West and student reps to from Avery and other off campus
houses to discuss undergraduate housing lottery system (for housing
outside of the seven houses). Early lottery systems were discussed for
Avery, Marks, Chester, and Del Mar. It was decided that Avery would have
its own early lottery (with 33% of rooms available going to early
lottery). Marks would also have an early lottery system (again about
one-third of the spots would go to early lottery). After much discussion
it was decided that Chester and Del Mar should not have early lottery
systems. Because of the apartment setting of these locations the
community aspect found at other unaffiliated places is not seen. As a
result early lottery system was not recommended for Chester and Del Mar.
Another discussion was around the dates for card picks, unaffiliated
lottery, etc.
Undergrads will receive a brochure with all this information early third
term.
Later that night:
IHC meeting; everyone present except for Kristen (guess she forgot…!)
(btw, for clarification: Mike=Blacker Mike; Lammers=Page Mike; Tom=Fleming
Tom; Tom2=ASCIT Tom)
Jeremy went over some business:
1. Meeting with RAs: Kim West said that she would host a social gathering
at her place for the IHC and the RAs for third term (the goal of this
gathering would be for the RAs and the IHC to meet each other and bond…).
Right now, the tentative date is Friday April 18, from 5-7 pm. Though to
our disappointment there will not be a Mannion barbeque, we were promised
"heavy hors d'oeuvres." Whatever that is! Tom said and he and Kristen
usually have practice or a game on Fridays until around 6 pm. Natalia
suggested that the event be on a Sunday night so that we would be feed on
a weekend when we don't normally get food. On a personal note, I think
the 18th is bad as well-I'll be 21 on that day, and I was kind of planning
on being not so sober...
2. There is a room in the Student Center (Keck) that IHC could claim as
Jeremy claims that room is really small-but Kim West offered to put a
computer in it for us. Lammers said that if we didn't have to do any work
for it, we might as well take it. Most of the IHC thought that it was
pointless.
3. Alcohol: So Kim still has the alcohol from last year, which was
confiscated at the end of various House parties. Jeremy says that there
is a good amount of alcohol left over (and not just mixers)…the question
was, what should we do with it? Best idea proposed: IHC Happy Hour. We
could have an all-houses-invited Happy Hour sometime third term.
Locations mentioned for the venue, R-F courtyard or Olive Walk. Our
slogan: "ASCIT brings you donuts, IHC brings you booz!"
4. Monthly meetings with administration: Kim had asked Jeremy what
he thought about monthly Kim West-IHC meetings. Jeremy asked us what we
thought. The consensus was that if wasn't needed. Someone asked about
monthly meetings with Margo Marshak. Jeremy will email her again.
5. Director of Admissions: Jeremy received a letter from Charlene
Liebau in response to his letter (which was about the outrage of students
over the cutting of pre-frosh weekend by a day). The letter didn't
answer many questions-it is very political, explaining that there were
budget cuts. Evidently the budget gets decided over the summer, so Jeremy
plans on talking to Margo about it. Again, he will email her again. We
also noted that last year there was talk of chopping a day off pre-frosh
weekend. Baltimore "saved the day" by finding more money somehow…but
evidently, this year he didn't feel the pressure.
6. ASCIT: Jeremy feels like he and Tom2 may have some issues this
year-Tom2 seems to want to turn ASCIT into the IHC. There are some
concerns over the fact that Tom2 may over-step his authority. ASCIT and
IHC are not the same. We discussed our (and other students) concern over
how Tom chose the two student reps for the Size of Caltech Committee and
the Dean of Undergraduate Academics Committee. Tom should have put up
sign ups and held interviews-there are no excuses there (esp. since he
came into office on a no secrecy forum). As a result of student
complaint, the two appointed students are interim until official
appointments are made. The next concern was the Excomm bit. I explained
to IHC what the Excomm does and in the past how they have been chosen.
There is some concern over any sort of house elections for this. The
survey seems pointless as well. Jeremy will inform Tom that people don't
even know what the Excomm is or does and that he should remedy that.
7. Pre-Frosh Weekend Rules: We need to talk about this. Jeremy asked
everyone to read them online of in the little t. We'll talk about it next
term.
Other business:
1. Jason and Lammers: they discussed the coliseum. Ruddock was told
that if they want to keep it up they will have to make some safety kind of
additions to the coliseum. This will take time and money. Jeremy think
that money won't be that much (or actually none)-maybe Ruddock will keep
it up. Lammers says that Page would like to use it in a gladiator-king of
social event. Maybe all the houses will be invited (IHC Happy Hour and
Gladiator Sports?!). But Lammers has no definitive date-he'll get back to
Jason.
2. Natalia: she had concerns over ASCIT paying CDS for the barbeque
during Pre-Frosh Weekend. Jeremy said that the money wasn't going to CDS,
but to Admissions-they don't have enough money. She also expressed
concern about how in the past FSI counselors have been mainly Scurves.
Natalia noted that this has created an environment where the FSI frosh
often decide to be Scurves even before going through Rotations-and
sometimes they know more they should about the process. As a result, she
would like to request a cap of one FSI counselor from each House. Only
one from each house was thought to be a little extreme, but as a whole the
IHC agreed with her (it was suggested to set the cap at two).
3. Jessie: Met with Lauren in the Study Abroad Office. There will be
students from University of London here next year-they will be here for a
year. They will have singles in Avery, though are encouraged to go
through Rotation and to pick into the Houses. They would like the
students to be very involved in the Houses (ie attend House dinners). Any
ideas? We didn't understand why this was such an important note, but
decided that we needed to consider this in our Rotation meeting. Also
there will be Danish students again (up to 5). Again during our Rotation
meeting we need to come up with a system for which Houses will take them.
Lauren suggested that we assign a student "mentor" to each student so that
they will assimilate into the Houses better. We didn't feel like this was
a problem this past year.
4. Neda: there will be a meeting in Ruddock next week-Tuesday, 12:30.
Jeremy told me to email a reminder to everyone.
Maintained by neda :)
Last modified 03-17-03