| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Asmodeus
 Hobgoblin
Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 11
|
Subject: Variations: Kim D&D vs. D&D 3.5 canon Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:11 pm |
|
|
Salutations.
As I listen to these podcasts and watch the video, I find myself often-times with a 'WTF' look on my face. This generally happens when I hear you describing a game-mechanic or rule that varies from the official rules laid out by Wizards.
The problem I find myself having is that I am often confused as to whether this is simple human error, or if this it a variation imposed for your games only.
I'd like to suggest that when you are incorporating a house-rule, you mention that its not described as acting that way in the rule-book. _________________ Canada - The little-known 10th Layer of Hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Subius Eversio
 Hobgoblin
Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 34
|
Subject: Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:06 pm |
|
|
| Well, if we were to do that, about 5 hours of the game session would be taken up by saying "this is a house rule" over and over again. You'd be better off checking out the "Kim D&D" link at the top of the page and reading the intro to that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Asmodeus
 Hobgoblin
Joined: 30 Oct 2005 Posts: 11
|
Subject: Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:10 am |
|
|
Well, I was thinking he would only do it the first time the house rule is used in the podcast, so the first 1 or 2 sessions might be half of saying 'this is a house rule' but then it would tame down. _________________ Canada - The little-known 10th Layer of Hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|