Is the Canon G2 digital camera any good for astrophotography? What are some of the things to watch out for? I've used my G2 for astrophotography periodically, and I've collected some of my experiences and notes here for others with the G2 to peruse.
The Canon G2 camera is a great camera, especially for normal use, but its performance in astrophotography really depends on what you're trying to do with it. It is generally quite good for bright objects in the sky, such as the moon or naked eye planets, but it is not well suited for taking photos of deep-sky objects.
Here are the strengths of the Canon G2 for astrophotography:
Here are some of the weaknesses of the Canon G2 camera when it comes to astrophotography:
What this means is that if you are interested in taking photos of the sun (ONLY DO SO WITH SAFE SOLAR FILTERS IN PLACE!!!), moon, or naked-eye planets, you will probably be quite satisfied with your results. Land photography (bird or nature photography, for example) is also quite feasible with this setup. But, don't expect to get much if you go for the deep-sky photography or any photography that requires long exposure times; this camera simply isn't designed for those kind of tasks.
Now, you may still be able to get decent photos of reasonably bright deep-sky objects by taking several 15-second exposures at the camera's ISO400 setting, and then stacking the images with appropriate software. I have not personally experimented with this technique, but I have heard that others have had decent success with this approach. Once I experiment with this, I will put my results up here as well.
Now that I've gone through that overview, here are some more details on the general points I have outlined.
Vignetting is the single most annoying challenge to deal with on the Canon G2. Without taking special measures, you can easily end up with highly unsatisfying photos like these:
These were all taken through an 8" aperature Meade LX200 SCT, using the standard Meade 26mm Plossl eyepiece, and a variable-length eyepiece-projection adapter also made by Meade. The vignetting is so bad quite simply because there is a LOT of space between the eyepiece and the camera, and the camera's lens is significantly larger than the eyepiece's lens.
All hope is not lost, however. There is an eyepiece made by a company called ScopeTronix, called the MaxView 40. It is extremely helpful in minimizing the effects of vignetting when using the Canon G2. It does this by providing T-adapter threads right on the end of the eyepiece, so that the distance between the eyepiece and the camera's lens can be brought to an absolute minimum.
(ScopeTronix provides a very helpful document outlining some of the challenges of digital camera astrophotography. I highly recommend reading it; it is very useful. The document may be accessed here.)
Using the MaxView 40 eyepiece yields a tremendous improvement with the vignetting issue; however, you will see that the problem is not completely resolved. Here are several photos demonstrating the capabilities of the MaxView 40 when it comes to eliminating vignetting. Note that the MaxView 40 has an adjustable sleeve, allowing one to vary the distance between the camera and the eyepiece. Also, minimal vignetting is typically seen when the camera is completely zoomed in. These photos show the whole range of both camera zooming and MaxView 40 sleeve adjustments. You will see how dramatic the impact can be!
These photos are of a branch in a large tree, near dusk, from about 100' away. Some of the photos ended up with a shutter-speed of up to 1 second to take decent photos; that is why the leaves are blurred in some of the shots. The point is not the sharpness though; it's the ability of the MaxView 40 to minimize vignetting.